Professional Development

Professional Development

The process of educating teachers, including improving their pedagogy and the use of tech tools.


Teacher professional development tools don’t fit neatly into well-defined buckets like those for digital curriculum. There's no scope and sequence for progressing through the teaching practice. There are a host of views on what "PD" means. And views on how teachers "plug into" professional development vary widely. What's clear: any thoughtful definition of professional development demands careful consideration of the classroom, school, and district context.

What does good professional development look like?

There’s no shortage of opinions on what constitutes good teacher professional development. EdSurge friend and lifelong educator Mike Berman sees PD as a set of “strategies to practice and develop over time until mastered and implemented with ease,” with much of that development coming through reflection and discussion. Nicole Martin, director of 21st century teaching and learning at the Mount Vernon School tends to agree. Teachers at the suburban Atlanta independent school can request a Google-like “genius hour” to spend experimenting and reflecting upon their practice as they see fit.

Dan Callahan, co-founder of Edcamp, thinks it’s as simple as treating teachers like the professionals they hope to become. As is the case with doctors and lawyers, teachers should seek improvement that's “relevant to what’s happening in [their] classroom right now” since they’re the ones most cognizant of what they don’t know, Callahan notes. Adam Carter and Kieran McMillan from Summit Public Schools echo Callahan’s sentiments, noting that PD “must be delivered when most needed, not as a check box administrator task.”

In short: good professional development should embody the learning environment for a particular school or classroom. Heavy on inquiry-based learning? Seek out PD opportunities that are as open-ended as the assignments you give to students. Transitioning to more data-driven instruction? Then make sure you have a set of metrics to measure your own development against.

Undergoing professional development experiences which model the instruction in your classroom and school provides an informal feedback loop on how to improve your own instruction. That kind of alignment means you're going to learn something about how that pedagogy is received by your students--even if the specific content isn't exactly what you were hoping to get. 

Was that workshop you suffered through really 'PD'?

Traditionally professionaldevelopment has followed the time-honored workshop format: Call in a fewsubstitutes or pick a district holiday, bring in the experts and coaches andwatch innovation happen (or at least cross off an annual requirement). To alesser extent, conferences have served the same purpose.

Other types of PD involvesupplemental coursework, certifications, co-teaching, receiving and providingmentorship, self-observation (video), and perhaps most popular amongtech-minded teachers, self-inquiry (aka your Twitter personal learningnetwork).

All of these PD experiences arehobbled by at least one of three major flaws: time, differentiation andaccountability.

Even if all courses,certifications, and conferences were of exceptional quality (imagine, folks!),there simply isn't enough time--or money--to shepherd, oh, say, 3.5 millionteachers through such training on an annual basis.

Even if the necessary resources todo so were available, it would take an unprecedented effort to meet the needsand wants of each individual teacher.

And even if such an effort werecompleted, catalogued, and wonderfully organized, how would we know if ateacher successfully implemented the new skill set that he or she developed?

Simply put, preparing math lessonsfor 8th graders just isn't enough: any 8th grade class is a rich mixture ofabilities and needs, including ELL or low-SES or SWD or GATE students.Exchanges over how to teach these varied groups is exactly the kind ofassistance many teachers would most like to receive. After all, if such detailsare unaccounted for, how can we really connect student outcomes to teacherimprovement?

What about the research?

We’ve collected a ton of buzzwords from the crowd: “differentiated,” “embodied,” “zone of proximal development,” “accountability,” “teacher-centered,” “student-centered,” “reflection.” All point to this idea of just-in-time, culturally and content relevant, measurable, easily digested info bites for educators. (Breath!) Not surprisingly, the same kind of learning many advocate for on behalf of students.

Fortunately the research community appears to be largely in agreement. And a few have gone so far to address the subject from a technological perspective. A white paper from Utah State University’s DigitalCommons@USU nicely distills the “seven characteristics of effective TTPD [technology-related teacher professional development]” as identified by the 2010 National Education Technology Plan from the US Dept of Education. PD should:

  1. Relate to teachers’ content areas;
  2. Be collaborative;
  3. Be consistent with technology goals in the district;
  4. Allow for active engagement with content;
  5. Be tailored to different levels of teachers’ knowledge, skill, and interest;
  6. Be sustained;
  7. Include follow-up activities.

(Here’s a working list of PD literature we’re reading.) 

And so where is our taxonomy?!

One thing is clear from practitioners and researchers alike: teacher PD is not simply an event, or a session, or a workshop. Nor does it fit neatly into buckets for how-to-guides, lesson planning, pedagogical tricks, and tech support. This is one taxonomy for thinking about specific needs, but it does not necessarily lead to improved teacher practice.

Professional development is a process. A habit-forming endeavor. An ongoing individual and institutional professional responsibility to seek, share, develop, and exchange the most needed and desired skill sets.

Dan Callahan rightly pointed out that “teaching is an art and a science.”

In early 2014, EdSurge published its guide to personalize professional development. Here it is.

We're not finished, thought. Stay tuned for more on how we improve our understanding of PD and of how to share what's valuable about tools in the PD space. We're still on hunt, still looking for ways to address these fluid, dynamic practices in every tool, topic, and news item--not just lesson planners and comprehensive PD tools--that can help educators. --by Leonard Medlock

Get our email newsletterSign me up
Keep up to date with our email newsletterSign me up