edX's New Working Papers Find MOOC Data Misleading

column | MOOCs

edX's New Working Papers Find MOOC Data Misleading

Jan 21, 2014

READ BETWEEN THE (DATA) LINES: Today appears to be a day of announcements for MOOC providers--first Coursera, now edX. Today, MIT and Harvard announced their release of a series of working papers on 17 of their edX MOOCs from the 2012/2013 years. The working papers include details about each MOOC that collectively offer several key conclusions about MOOCs as a tool and practice. MIT News reports key takeaways, including:

  1. MOOC completion rates can be misleading and may at times be counterproductive indicators of the impact of open online courses.
  2. Attrition happened predominately right after students registered for a course. On average, 50% of registrants left a week or two after enrolling; following that time, attrition rates decreased. (The average probability of a student leaving in the second week dropped to 16%.)
  3. Read between the lines when it comes to demographics. For example, the most common course registrant in these 17 courses was a male with a bachelor’s degree, and age 26+. However, that describes fewer than one in three registrants for these MOOCs (about 31%).
Learn more about EdSurge operations, ethics and policies here. Learn more about EdSurge supporters here.

More from EdSurge

Get our email newsletterSign me up
Keep up to date with our email newsletterSign me up