Editor’s Note: ‘Tis the trendy season for trends, to reflect on 2015 and to make bold predictions about what next year may hold. This year, we asked thought leaders to share their outlooks on education, but with a twist. They have to frame their thoughts as a response to some of the finest college application essay prompts—yes, the very same ones that high school seniors are feverishly working on now!
Writing prompt: Orange is the new black, fifty’s the new thirty, comedy is the new rock ‘n’ roll, ___ is the new ___. What’s in, what’s out, and why is it being replaced?
Digital technology is the new opiate of the masses
In the mid-1990s, as the Internet was going mainstream, educators began sounding an alarm about the digital divide—the chasm in access to digital technologies that separated the haves from the have-nots, particularly in schools.
Just two decades later, though, it’s hard to believe we worried at all. Digital screens—whether as laptops or smartphones—are becoming common items even in low-income households. Worldwide, there are more mobile phone accounts than there are people on the planet.
It’s not that the digital divide has fully closed. In the United States, poorer families disproportionately lack broadband, for example. The rich can always afford more technology. But, it is increasingly difficult to find classrooms and libraries—even in poorer neighborhoods—that don’t have computers and Internet connectivity.
Except, that is, in some expensive private schools. Earlier this year, there was a spate of articles in the UK about the
London Acorn School, a $16,000-a-year school whose charter says, “We are against all forms of electronics for small children…and only gradual integration towards it in adolescence.” The school not only bans devices the classroom, but asks parents to prohibit technology use otherwise.
These parents are responding to accumulating evidence about digital distraction: The American Academy of Pediatrics
recommends that parents closely monitor digital device use by their children. This year, the OECD reported that around the world, students making frequent use of computers fared worse academically than their peers. Researchers at the London School of Economics determined that banning mobile phones at school was worth an extra week of classes each year.
All of this is to say that well-educated parents are heeding the science about digital technology’s dubious effects on learning, and wealthier families are paying top dollar to limit how much screen time their children have.
The flip side, though, is that families who are less aware of the research are falling on the wrong side of an
inverted digital divide. Many welcome technology in their schools under the misguided impression that spending more time with a computer in and of itself makes their children more eligible for Silicon Valley jobs. But that promise is empty. It makes no more sense than to do a lot of driving as a way to become an engine designer at Ford. What’s worse, the myth is actively propagated by well-paid technology cheerleaders, some of whom no doubt have nannies at home, instructed to keep their children away from technology.
Stay up to date on edtech.Sign up to have top stories delivered weekly.