Product Index
Curriculum Products
In Summit Reflections, educators review tools that they have seen at an EdSurge Tech for Schools Summit. Summit Reflections can only be completed onsite at the event; reviewers are incentivized to leave reviews.
Teacher, School Type: Middle School, High School, High ELL Population, Low Income Population

full starfull starfull starfull starfull star Advocate

Usage: Create group discussions for my students during my small group reading rotation. I can Students reading materials and they can have discussions in and outside of class, and I can also be part of those discussions.

Strengths: The fact that I am a teacher can be part of the discussion is an awesome thing. You can add questions or have students create their own.

Suggestions for Improvement: Hopefully they will soon have tools that will recommend books based on lexile levels to make it easier for students of different reading levels to use them.

Verdict: With small groups and independent reading groups, tea are not usually part of the students discussion, but this tool will enable the teachers to see what the students are talk about and help to guide, refocus and moderate the discussion.

Librarian, School Type: Elementary School, Low Income Population

full starfull starfull starno starno star Neutral

Usage: This looks like an excellent resource for my teachers to use with their guided reading groups or whole class literature readings.

Strengths: The product looks good and very professional. I like the ability it gives teachers to select pre-created questions and modify them, and base them on specific standards. That's powerful.

Suggestions for Improvement: Add the ability to share questions with other teachers.
It would nice to have a database of other teacher-created questions.
Make it compatible for districts to downloaad student information so you don't have to do it yourself.

Verdict: This is a fantastic idea, and appears to offer lots of versatile features. I especially like the links to standards. However, the product is still in its infancy. If it survives its birthing pains it looks to be a powerful resource.

DLC, School Type: Elementary School, Middle School, High School

full starno starno starno starno star Wouldn't Advocate

Usage: Our district already has an LMS that could essentially do the same thing as this product. It does provide additional basic CCSS questions, but other than that I don't see how it does anything that our, or many LMS's can do.

Strengths: This product does provide a little more kid friendly visual environment than other LMS's

Suggestions for Improvement: Our district already has an LMS that could essentially do the same thing as this product. It does provide additional basic CCSS questions, but other than that I don't see how it does anything that our, or many LMS's can do.

Verdict: Our district already has an LMS that could essentially do the same thing as this product. It does provide additional basic CCSS questions, but other than that I don't see how it does anything that our, or many LMS's can do.

Paraeducator, School Type: High School, BYOD Devices

full starfull starfull starfull starfull star Advocate

Usage: I would use this program for the student group that I am working with to engage them in reading and to increase their comprehension.

Strengths: The ability for students to take interest in their reading is important. They don't have to feel as if we are telling them what to read. It gives the teachers the ability to track progess of their reading skills.

If srudents are not progressing they can be reminded that they chose the book and that they can also change their selection and get feedback and suggestions from peers.

This is something that they do with social media so it can be presented as an extension of those skills.

Suggestions for Improvement: I don't have any improvements to not at this time as I believe ot will work for our students as explained and seen at the demo.

Verdict: My school currently is struggling to engage all students in SSR due to not having books of interest or their reading levels. By having their own book shelves would allow them to take responsibility for choosing books and following through on reading them.

Having the ability to provide guide questions is also beneficial as that too is a way for student s to fall along the wayside because they get or feel "stuck". I am excited to present this information to the teachers so that all of the students can benefit and have ownwership of their libraries.

Teacher, School Type: Other, Blended Learning

full starfull starfull starfull starfull star Advocate

Usage: All students, different levels - encourage to experience reading, comprehension, etc.

Strengths: This product promotes active reading by encouraging students to annotate the text they are reading. I like that I can create assignments online and then track progress. The data would be useful to help update IEP goals and determine areas of strenght/weakness.

Suggestions for Improvement: It would be hard to determine weaknesses until I have actively used the product.

Verdict: It would allow differentiation in reading instruction. I imagine using the program to supplement reading comprehension lessons, and to keep those students who finish first from having any wasted time. All above , and - for staff development

Teacher, School Type: Elementary School, High ELL Population, Low Income Population

full starfull starfull starfull starfull star Advocate

Usage: Help with reading logs and book clubs

Strengths: There is a wide variety of uses to help students keep track of their reading and help facilitate collaborative book clubs and keeps them accountable and engaged

Suggestions for Improvement: Have a way to limit recommendation of books to what's in teacher or school library or keep track of books in teacher library

Verdict: Helps with student accountability and reporting of student progress and would save me time in helping with better student feedback

ELL specialist, School Type: Elementary School

full starfull starfull starfull starno star Advocate

Usage: I would use this product with my ELL groups 3rd-6th grades. Students could use it to record their reading logs.

Strengths: I like that teachers can create activities such as the puzzles. On the dashboard, there are book groups, discussion questions, and ways to embed vocab. words.

Students are able to create book lists and write book reviews.

The reports on student progress looks useful.

Suggestions for Improvement: I would like to see books leveled or grade recommendations to help ELLs identify books.

Verdict: I would recommend it because it has sentence starters for students having a difficult time beginning their book reviews. Teachers can choose the CCSS standards to create their own questions. There is a grading feature.

Student, School Type: High School, Project Based School

full starfull starfull starfull starno star Advocate

Usage: This product seems like a great idea but I don't think it is a good product for students older than 7th grade. Because of the of the way it is set up the students wouldn't really try and it just seems that his product would be best suited for a younger student body.

Strengths: the hands on concept and the live discussions are great and kids will think the games are fun.

Suggestions for Improvement: wake it more useable for older audiences and deeper reaing questions

Verdict: this would be a good program for students who fell behind in reading or who need work on reading comprehention.

Teacher, School Type: Elementary School, High ELL Population, Low Income Population

full starfull starfull starfull starno star Advocate

Usage: I would use it as part of book clubs. This will help ensure that students are actively engaged in their learning

Strengths: I like the fact that they actually read a book but then answer the questions associated with the book online.

Suggestions for Improvement: As I haven't actually used the learning platform, it's hard to say what I would want to change.

Verdict: The program is currently free. In the next school year they are going to add a premium membership that you would have to pay for but it still seems to be a great value.

Teacher, School Type: Middle School, BYOD Devices

full starfull starfull starfull starno star Advocate

Usage: I would like to use it with independent and literature circle reading...having students interact with one another about what they are reading.

Strengths: The amount of novels is very diverse. I like that students can suggest books to friends and create a reading list and log.

Suggestions for Improvement: I really like it as it is. Maybe a way for teachers to join in to the student conversation--it may have that, I wasn't able to check it all out.

Verdict: I like the flexibility and the fact that the novel selection is so current.

Student, School Type: High School, Project Based School

full starfull starfull starfull starno star Advocate

Usage: I would use this to learn more about reading in my independent learning.

Strengths: I think this product helps students do better in their learning about reading because they can go more in depth on their reading.

Suggestions for Improvement: I wouldn't change a lot about this product. I might make it not based o grade level though.

Verdict: I would reccommend this because it is a good way of tracking reading and letting you know how you're doing.

Teacher Librarian, School Type: Elementary School, High ELL Population, Low Income Population

full starfull starfull starfull starno star Advocate

Usage: I would like to create book clubs for students in our library.

Strengths: The ability to have students communicate with others, recommending books and responding to a discussion.

Suggestions for Improvement: I haven't used it so I am not sure what would need improvement.

Verdict: This would be great tool to have studnets collobrate & communicate - having a discussion about books.

Principal, School Type: Elementary School, Low Income Population

full starfull starfull starfull starno star Advocate

Usage: This would be an excellent tool for book clubs at all levels. It would allow for differentiation for students at higher levels.

Strengths: It allows the teacher to customize.

Suggestions for Improvement: This is hard to respond to, since we have not actually used it yet.

Verdict: N/A - haven't actually tried it yet.

Digital Learning Coach, School Type: Elementary School, Middle School, High School

full starfull starfull starno starno star Neutral

Usage: I would use it in my resource Language Arts class to differentiate instruction. I like that there is a social element to using the product.

Strengths: There are some tools that would support my special education students, such as text to speech and highlighting. It is great that it aligns to common core state standards, so that I can quickly determine where my students have areas of weakness in comprehension.

Suggestions for Improvement: I haven't used this tool yet, but so far I can't think of any changes I would make to the product.

Verdict: I would use this tool to track the reading comprehension of my students with IEP goals in reading comprehension. It would be a handy way to track what students are reading, and what they are interested in reading. I like that there are gamifications aspects to it.

Amy, Teacher. School Type: Middle School, College Prep School

full starfull starfull starno starno star Neutral

Usage: I would use this as a collaborative space when my 6th graders read books from their novel units

Strengths: It looks appealing for sixth graders and they like be to share online. It seems like it foul be a fun collaborative tool

Suggestions for Improvement: Contact school districts, find out their required books, and have questions already on site

Verdict: If the books from our units are spread in the system I would highly recommend it. If I need to input the book and questions then I would be less likely to recommend

Teacher, School Type: Elementary School, High ELL Population, Low Income Population

full starfull starfull starfull starfull star Advocate

Usage: I love that this product incourages collaboration and it has several option to individualize itr with the students and the class

Strengths: I love that the produce encourages collaboration!

Suggestions for Improvement: I would love to see it adapted for younger studentrs.

Verdict: I would recommend it because it is so collaborative. My school is low in their literacy levels and I think this product will encourage students to engage in their reading.

The only hesitation I have is that it is a 3-12 product. I teach K-2 maybe 3. I could see adapting it to second possibly but other wise it will not be usable fo rmy classroom

Teacher Librarian, School Type: Elementary School, High ELL Population, Low Income Population

full starfull starfull starfull starno star Advocate

Usage: This is a tool I would like to use to organzie book discussion groups for small groups of students in our library.

Strengths: The product tracks student independent reading well and it also allows for the creation of book discussion groups with easy access.

Suggestions for Improvement: I don't have any suggestions at this time.

Verdict: This is a strong platform to help staff and stduents organzie and respond to gropu discussions. It is also attractive to students logging independent reading. It lets teachers have easy acccess to student reponses and the amount of reading they are doing.

Paraprofessional, School Type: Elementary School, High ELL Population

full starfull starfull starno starno star Neutral

Usage: I would use this for my students at school.

Strengths: It improves the reading levels for the students.

Suggestions for Improvement: Nothing to change.

Verdict: There is always room for higher technology.

STAY UP TO DATE ON EDTECH
News, research, and opportunities - sent weekly.
STAY UP TO DATE ON EDTECH
News, research, and opportunities - sent weekly.